Advertisement

Sibling Comparisons Revise Long-Term Effects of Breast-Feeding

April 8, 2014

Sibling Comparisons Revise Long-Term Effects of Breast-Feeding

  1. Cornelius W. Van Niel, MD

Comparison of siblings who were and were not breast-fed shows no long-term benefit from breast-feeding on measures of obesity and some behavioral and academic outcomes.

  1. Cornelius W. Van Niel, MD

Sociologists have been studying the hypothesis that the long-term superiority of breast-feeding could be due to socioeconomic factors and disparities between mothers and children who do and do not breast-feed, rather than from breast-feeding itself. To examine this possibility and account for unmeasured differences that might affect outcomes, researchers used longitudinal data collected between 1986 and 2010 to compare outcomes in a subset of 1773 siblings (mean age, 9 years) from families with one child who breast-fed and one who did not.

In the full sample of 8237 children, children who were breast-fed had significantly better measures of body mass index, obesity, hyperactivity, parental attachment, vocabulary, reading, math, Wechsler Intelligence Scale, and self-reported scholastic competence, in analysis that controlled for known maternal, prenatal, and birth factors. Similar differences were found in analyses of breast-feeding duration and in children who had ever breast-fed. Interestingly, asthma was significantly more common in breast-fed children. The outcome of behavioral compliance (following household rules) was similar in breast-fed and non–breast-fed groups. However, in analysis of the sibling subgroup, all outcome measures were similar between breast-fed children and their non–breast-fed siblings.

Comment

This clever natural comparison of siblings who were and were not breast-fed — and presumably shared similar genetic and environmental factors –– suggests that the benefits of breast-feeding on long-term outcomes related to obesity, behavior, and academics might not be as great as previously thought. The findings do not disprove the short-term benefits of breast-feeding in infants (e.g., reduced ear infections and gastroenteritis, and possibly SIDS risk) or long-term benefits in women of cancer and cardiovascular risk reduction. The authors conclude that breastfeeding can be an economic “sacrifice” and might have less long-term benefit than previously thought. Breast-feeding remains a recommended choice for women for many reasons, but women who cannot or choose not to breast-feed should not feel that their children are destined for inferior outcomes.

  • Disclosures for Cornelius W. Van Niel, MD at time of publication Equity Covidien; Express Scripts; Johnson & Johnson; Merck

Citation(s):

Your Comment

(will not be published)

Filtered HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Do you have any conflict of interest to disclose?
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

* Required

Reader comments are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement