Advertisement

HIV Detected in "Mississippi Baby" — Physician’s First Watch

Medical News |
July 11, 2014

HIV Detected in "Mississippi Baby"

By Kelly Young

Edited by André Sofair, MD, MPH, and William E. Chavey, MD, MS

The so-called "Mississippi baby" — an infant who was born with HIV but was in prolonged remission — now has detectable levels of the virus, federal health officials announced Thursday.

The girl, who is now almost 4, was born prematurely to a mother who was HIV positive. At birth, the girl tested positive for HIV and was started on antiretrovirals within 30 hours, but was then lost to follow-up and discontinued treatment at age 18 months. Five months later, she had undetectable levels of HIV. For more than 2 years, she did not take antiretrovirals, but since HIV was detected in her blood (16,750 copies/mL), she has restarted treatment.

"Certainly, this is a disappointing turn of events for this young child, the medical staff involved in the child's care, and the HIV/AIDS research community," Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said in a news release. "Scientifically, this development reminds us that we still have much more to learn about the intricacies of HIV infection and where the virus hides in the body."

Reader Comments (2)

Dr.PHANENDER KETHA Physician, Pulmonary Medicine, VISAKHAPATNAM,ANDHRA PRADESH,INDIA

The results are disappointing but one should appreciate the good scientific follow up and updation. More to be learnt about HIV.
Dr.PHANENDER KETHA, MD;FHM ( CMC,VELLORE ).

John O'Brien Other Healthcare Professional, Family Medicine/General Practice

I am aware of an individual known by me personally for 19 years who is now HIV positive x 27+ years, 25 of which he was on NO HIV meds. He is extremely knowledgeable about HIV, has seen internationally recognized HIv experts, and reports that not once has anyone inquired about investigating why he managed to remain disease-free but HIV + for so long. IMHO this is an indictment of the medical paradigm around this issue.

Your Comment

(will not be published)

Filtered HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Do you have any conflict of interest to disclose?
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

* Required

Reader comments are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement